Editorial Standards
At Vitalbreathe, we are committed to providing accurate, evidence-based information about nutrition and wellness. Our editorial standards ensure every article meets rigorous criteria for quality, credibility, and transparency.
Our Promise: Integrity in Every Article
The information on this site is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.
Five Core Editorial Principles
These principles guide all content creation, review, and publication at Vitalbreathe.
Accuracy & Fact-Checking
Every claim in our articles is verified against peer-reviewed research and credible scientific sources. Our writers cite specific studies and avoid overgeneralizations. We distinguish between established science and emerging findings.
Complete Transparency
We clearly label editorial content, disclose any affiliate relationships, and explain our sources. Our disclaimers are prominent and truthful. Readers always know who wrote the article and what qualifications they hold.
No Medical Claims
We do not diagnose, treat, or claim to cure any condition. Our articles about nutrition are informational only. We always recommend consulting healthcare professionals for personal medical advice and never position food as medicine.
Editorial Independence
Content decisions are made by our editorial team based on quality and relevance, never commercial pressure. Writers follow the same standards regardless of brand relationships. Independence strengthens reader trust.
Honest Corrections
When errors occur, we correct them promptly and transparently. Corrections are noted at the article top with the date and reason. We never quietly edit away mistakes—accuracy comes before pride.
Credible Sources
We prioritize peer-reviewed journals, government health agencies, and expert organizations. Popular magazines are used for context only, never as primary evidence. All major claims include citations readers can verify.
Our Editorial Team
Our editors and writers bring diverse expertise in nutrition science, health communication, and journalism.
Elena Virtanen
Editor-in-Chief
PhD in Nutritional Science from University of Helsinki. 12 years in research communication. Elena oversees all content for scientific accuracy and ensures adherence to editorial standards.
Mikko Salonen
Health & Nutrition Editor
Registered Dietitian Nutritionist and science journalist. Mikko evaluates nutrition research and ensures articles reflect current evidence. He also fact-checks all dietary recommendations.
Aino Mäkelä
Managing Editor
Aino manages our publication schedule, oversees corrections, and ensures compliance with editorial standards. With 8 years in digital publishing, she maintains the integrity of our platform.
Riku Karvonen
Senior Writer
MSc in Biochemistry with specialization in metabolic health. Riku writes in-depth articles on energy metabolism and food science. All his work undergoes peer review before publication.
Our Fact-Checking Process
Every article follows a rigorous multi-step verification process before publication.
Research & Sourcing
Writers compile claims with citations to peer-reviewed studies, government health databases, and recognized expert organizations. All sources are documented and linked where possible.
Editorial Review
The Managing Editor reviews the draft for structure, clarity, and adherence to our standards. Claims are cross-checked against source material. Any unsupported statements are flagged for revision.
Expert Verification
Articles on specialized topics are reviewed by subject-matter experts—nutritionists, biochemists, or health researchers—who verify scientific accuracy and ensure claims align with current evidence.
Final Quality Check
The Editor-in-Chief performs a final review for tone, accuracy, and compliance with Vitalbreathe standards. Only then is the article approved for publication.
Ongoing Monitoring
After publication, articles are monitored for new research that might require updates. We also welcome reader feedback and corrections through our contact form.
Corrections & Updates Policy
How We Handle Errors
Accuracy is our highest priority. If an error is discovered—whether factual, scientific, or typographical—we correct it immediately. Corrections are documented transparently:
- Correction Notice: A note appears at the top of the article explaining the error and the correction made.
- Date Stamped: The date of correction is always visible so readers understand when the change was made.
- No Silent Edits: We never quietly revise articles without disclosure. Readers deserve to know what changed and why.
How To Report an Error
If you believe an article contains an inaccuracy, we welcome your feedback. Please send details to our editorial team:
Email: [email protected]
Include the article title, the specific claim, and why you believe it is inaccurate. Please provide credible sources to support your correction.
Article Updates
As nutrition science evolves, we update articles to reflect new research. Major updates receive an "Updated" notice at the article top with the date. Minor updates (like broken links or clarifications) may not receive a notice but are tracked internally.
Articles older than 18 months are reviewed to ensure recommendations still align with current evidence. If research contradicts an older article, we update or retire it transparently.
Learn More
Our Disclaimer
For a complete explanation of how to use our content and our limitation of liability, please read our full disclaimer.
Read DisclaimerFrequently Asked Questions
Have questions about our content, sourcing, or editorial practices? Visit our FAQ section for common answers.
Browse FAQsQuestions About Our Editorial Process?
Our editorial team welcomes inquiries about our standards, fact-checking, and content decisions. Contact us anytime with feedback or suggestions.Get In Touch